Creating a comfortable living environment is one goal of conscientious residential architecture. Home designs that are also sympathetic to site, heritage and environment have a positive social benefit, adding depth, character and value to a neighborhood.
With its traditional appearance a deliberate nod to the collegiate architecture of some of the East Coast's finest schools, this 12,000 sqft mansion adds even more amplitude to a region already renowned for its compelling architectural heritage.
Marcus Gleysteen, the home's designer, has for many years designed homes in and around New England.
"This particular residence required extensive research. Our design team has an in-depth knowledge of current and historic architectural practices, but with this project we literally went to school to determine how to best relate the design back to the region," says the architect.
"In particular, we spent time studying the 19th and 20th Century buildings at nearby Harvard. Homes like this are a tremendous amount of fun. They are good for the neighborhood and a contrast to the cookie cutter, quasi-colonial homes that seem to be taking over smaller towns. The design of this house has its own freestyle manner. It reflects and supports the eclectic yet significant identity of the surroundings," he says.
Gleysteen's clients, a couple whose philanthropic interests required the construction of a large home suitable for hosting large charity functions, also have college-age children.
Therefore, while the home's red brick exterior portrays a traditional air, the interior layout was designed to meet a number of needs, based around different levels of occupancy.
Originally another home stood on the building site, and the project was first conceived as an extensive remodel. However, upon investigation of that structure it was found to be compromised by rot. All that could be salvaged were three fireplaces, the front door and some of the foundations.
At first glance the home appears Georgian in style, a symmetrical composition enriched with classical detail, but Gleysteen says this classification is too rigid.